[snmp] Making AsnObjectId comparable
Birgit Arkesteijn
birgit at westhawk.co.uk
Mon May 12 11:30:07 BST 2008
Hi Josh,
Yes, I did add the "implements Comparable". :-)
Cheers, Birgit
On 09/05/08 23:11, Josh Bers wrote:
> Birgit,
>
> As far as my limited testing has revealed it appears to work. You also need
> to add "implements Comparable" to the class declaration for it to be usable
> in sorted containers.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Josh
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: snmp-bounces at snmp.westhawk.co.uk
> [mailto:snmp-bounces at snmp.westhawk.co.uk] On Behalf Of Birgit Arkesteijn
> Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2008 5:40 AM
> To: List for discussion of the Westhawk SNMP stack
> Subject: RE: [snmp] Making AsnObjectId comparable
>
> I added Josh's implementation to AsnObjectId and checked it into cvs.
> It's compiled, but not tested.
>
> Thanks, Josh!
>
> Cheers, Birgit
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: RE: [snmp] Making AsnObjectId comparable
> Date: Fri, 2 May 2008 13:29:25 -0400
> From: Josh Bers <jbers at bbn.com>
> Organisation: BBN Technologies
> To: 'Birgit Arkesteijn' <Birgit at westhawk.co.uk>
> CC: 'Tim Panton' <thp at westhawk.co.uk>
>
>
> Here is the code for compare:
> Assumes that asn objects are all positive numbers, e.g.,
> 0-9+(\.[0-9]+)*
>
> *public* *int* compareTo (AsnObjectId b) {
> *if* (b == *null*)
> *throw* *new* NullPointerException("Trying to compare
> with null");
>
> *int* aElts = getSize();
> *int* bElts = b.getSize();
>
> *if* ((aElts == 0) && (bElts > 0))
> *return* -1;
>
> *if* ((bElts == 0) && (aElts > 0))
> *return* 1;
>
> *for* (*int* i = 0; (i < aElts) && (i < bElts); i++) {
> *if* (getElementAt(i) != b.getElementAt(i))
> *return* (getElementAt(i) > b.getElementAt(i)) ? 1
> : -1;
> }
> // equal to the end of one object
> *if* (aElts > bElts)
> *return* 1;
> *else* *if* (bElts > aElts)
> *return* -1;
>
> // both objects same
> *return* 0;
> }
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: snmp-bounces at snmp.westhawk.co.uk
> [mailto:snmp-bounces at snmp.westhawk.co.uk] On Behalf Of Josh Bers
> Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2008 2:24 PM
> To: 'List for discussion of the Westhawk SNMP stack'
> Subject: [snmp] Making AsnObjectId comparable
>
> I would vote for making the AsnObjectId comparable to help in situations
> where the stack is serving as an agent in order to order OID's correctly
> in a MIB. facilitating insertion into standard Java ordered container
> classes.
>
>
>
> Josh
>
>
>
> Josh Bers
>
> Senior Engineer, Mobile Networking Systems
>
> BBN Technologies
>
> web: www.bbn.com ph: (617) 873-4262 fax: (617) 873-4523
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> snmp mailing list
> snmp at snmp.westhawk.co.uk
> http://snmp.westhawk.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/snmp
>
--
-- Birgit Arkesteijn, birgit at westhawk.co.uk,
-- Westhawk Ltd, Albion Wharf, 19 Albion Street, Manchester M1 5LN, UK
-- Company no: 1769350
-- Registered Office:
-- 15 London Road, Stockton Heath, Warrington WA4 6SJ. UK.
-- tel.: +44 (0)161 237 0660
-- <URL: http://www.westhawk.co.uk>
More information about the snmp
mailing list