From birgitgjwa at googlemail.com  Thu Apr 10 12:21:17 2008
From: birgitgjwa at googlemail.com (Birgit Arkesteijn)
Date: Thu Apr 10 11:22:05 2008
Subject: [snmp] Removed relays.ordb.org from snmp.westhawk.co.uk
Message-ID: <e985d96f0804100321s7e1c5a74oa12e806e6d84c60@mail.gmail.com>

I'm trying to fix the problem that relays.ordb.org is blocking all incoming
mail to the mailing lists.

If you tried to post a message before and got a mail back that said
something like:

  snmp@snmp.westhawk.co.uk
    SMTP error from remote mail server after MAIL FROM:<XXX> <jbers@bbn.com>:
    host snmp.westhawk.co.uk [192.67.4.168]: 550 5.7.1 Mail from X.X.X.X
refused by blackhole site relays.ordb.org

please try again. The problem should be fixed.

Sorry for any inconvenience.

Cheers, Birgit

ps Thanks, Josh, for pointing this out to us!
From ferry at hupie.com  Thu Apr 10 14:42:14 2008
From: ferry at hupie.com (Ferry Huberts)
Date: Thu Apr 10 13:13:35 2008
Subject: [snmp] bulk request
Message-ID: <6308.217.169.232.211.1207827734.squirrel@hupie.xs4all.nl>

Hi!

I'm trying to send out a PDU for a bulk request. When there are less entries in the table I'm
trying to retrieve than the MaxRepetitions it doesn't work and I get


uk.co.westhawk.snmp.stack.DecodingException: Incorrect packet. No of bytes received less than
packet length.
	at uk.co.westhawk.snmp.stack.Pdu.fillin(Pdu.java:914)
	at uk.co.westhawk.snmp.stack.SnmpContextv2c.processIncomingResponse(SnmpContextv2c.java:150) at
uk.co.westhawk.snmp.stack.AbstractSnmpContext.run(AbstractSnmpContext.java:532) at
java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619)

I would have thought that this would work, that it would just return the number of entries in the
table. Am I misunderstanding functionality or is it a bug?

I'm using v6.0
--
Ferry Huberts








From birgit at westhawk.co.uk  Thu Apr 10 14:50:19 2008
From: birgit at westhawk.co.uk (Birgit Arkesteijn)
Date: Thu Apr 10 13:50:27 2008
Subject: [snmp] bulk request
In-Reply-To: <6308.217.169.232.211.1207827734.squirrel@hupie.xs4all.nl>
References: <6308.217.169.232.211.1207827734.squirrel@hupie.xs4all.nl>
Message-ID: <47FE0D0B.1030902@westhawk.co.uk>

Dear Ferry,

I think your right, this should work.

I just read the section in the rfc again, see
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3416.txt
4.2.3.  The GetBulkRequest-PDU


Regarding the repetitions is says:
    (2)   If there is no (i)-th lexicographic successor, then the
          corresponding variable binding produced in the Response-PDU has
          its value field set to "endOfMibView", and its name field set
          to either the last lexicographic successor, or if there are no
          lexicographic successors, to the (N + r)-th variable binding's
          name in the request.

    (2)   The response may also be generated with a lesser number of
          variable bindings if for some value of iteration i, such that i
          is greater than zero and less than or equal to M, that all of
          the generated variable bindings have the value field set to
          "endOfMibView".  In this case, the variable bindings may be
          truncated after the (N + (i * R))-th variable binding.

So, yes, it should either return a few "endOfMibView" or it should only 
return the entries in the table that are available (but are less than 
MaxRepetitions).

Either way, the agent is sending you an invalid response. There's 
nothing the stack can do about it.

Pure speculation on my part, but what I thinking is happening is that 
the agent calculates the length based on the value of MaxRepetitions, 
but the actual varbind list is shorter.

Cheers, Birgit


On 10/04/08 12:42, Ferry Huberts wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> I'm trying to send out a PDU for a bulk request. When there are less entries in the table I'm
> trying to retrieve than the MaxRepetitions it doesn't work and I get
> 
> 
> uk.co.westhawk.snmp.stack.DecodingException: Incorrect packet. No of bytes received less than
> packet length.
> 	at uk.co.westhawk.snmp.stack.Pdu.fillin(Pdu.java:914)
> 	at uk.co.westhawk.snmp.stack.SnmpContextv2c.processIncomingResponse(SnmpContextv2c.java:150) at
> uk.co.westhawk.snmp.stack.AbstractSnmpContext.run(AbstractSnmpContext.java:532) at
> java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619)
> 
> I would have thought that this would work, that it would just return the number of entries in the
> table. Am I misunderstanding functionality or is it a bug?
> 
> I'm using v6.0
> --
> Ferry Huberts


-- 
-- Birgit Arkesteijn, birgit@westhawk.co.uk,
-- Westhawk Ltd, Albion Wharf, 19 Albion Street, Manchester M1 5LN, UK
-- Company no: 1769350
-- Registered Office:
-- 15 London Road, Stockton Heath, Warrington WA4 6SJ. UK.
-- tel.: +44 (0)161 237 0660
-- <URL: http://www.westhawk.co.uk>
From jbers at bbn.com  Wed Apr  9 18:36:07 2008
From: jbers at bbn.com (Josh Bers)
Date: Wed Apr 16 10:43:07 2008
Subject: [snmp] FW: sending V3 traps with trapsess
Message-ID: <001101c89a89$cb0be2d0$c8fe5980@7C911>

Has anyone been able to get net-snmp to send authenticated and encrypted v3
traps to a Westhawk manager... I am running into loads of problems using
net-snmp 5.3.1. It never seems to use the local user name or USM security
parameters!

Any pointers would be much appreciated.

Josh

-----Original Message-----
From: Josh Bers [mailto:jbers@bbn.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 5:11 PM
To: 'Dave Shield'
Cc: 'net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net'
Subject: RE: sending V3 traps with trapsess

Now I am using 5.3.1 and getting the following error when I configure
trapsess (found in /var/log/message):

Snmpd[pid]: snmpd: send_trap: USM unknown security name (no such user
exists)

This is strange because on the line above the trapsess entry in
/etc/snmp/snmpd.conf I declare the user as a rwuser snmproot!

Is there some other configuration file that I need to tell about the users
that I will use in trapsess from the snmpd agent?

Josh


-----Original Message-----
From: Josh Bers [mailto:jbers@bbn.com] 
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 2:43 PM
To: 'Dave Shield'
Cc: 'net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net'
Subject: RE: sending V3 traps with trapsess

Dave,

OK, I will be upgrading shortly to net-snmp 5.3.1. Would you expect with
that version that the following trapsess will use the authoritative engineID
of the currently running snmpd process when sending traps to
<target-manager>?

trapsess -v 3 -u snmproot -a MD5 -A <rootAuthPass> -l authPriv -x DES -X
<rootPrivPass> <target-manager>


Josh

-----Original Message-----
From: net-snmp-users-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net
[mailto:net-snmp-users-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net] On Behalf Of Dave
Shield
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 3:09 PM
To: Josh Bers
Cc: net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: sending V3 traps with trapsess

On 02/04/2008, Josh Bers <jbers@bbn.com> wrote:
> I am seeing strange behavior when configuring snmpd to send traps using
> trapsess command in the snmpd.conf file.
>
> When I don't specify an engineID explicitly it attempts to do discovery
even
> though I am not asking for INFORMS!

> I am using version 5.1.2. Does anyone know if this has been fixed
> on later versions?

I've just tried this with both the current development code,
and the 5.2.x line.   In both cases, the agent sends the trap
immediately, with no engine probe.

I don't have a 5.1.x version immediately accessible, but I
seem to remember something being added a while back to
delay the engine probe for an SNMPv3 session until it
was actually needed.   So I suspect that this problem has
indeed been fixed in later releases.

Please note that the 5.1.x line was closed down about two
years ago.   We would *strongly* recommend that you
upgrade to a more recent version.

Dave

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users



From birgit at westhawk.co.uk  Wed Apr 16 12:24:18 2008
From: birgit at westhawk.co.uk (Birgit Arkesteijn)
Date: Wed Apr 16 11:24:25 2008
Subject: [snmp] Re: FW: sending V3 traps with trapsess
In-Reply-To: <001101c89a89$cb0be2d0$c8fe5980@7C911>
References: <001101c89a89$cb0be2d0$c8fe5980@7C911>
Message-ID: <4805D3D2.7080403@westhawk.co.uk>

Dear Josh,

I've had problems in the past, but I think it's not the same problem, see
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=20060206182223.GB3613%40westhawk.co.uk&forum_name=net-snmp-users

Unfortunately Wes' answer to my latest posting is omitted from this 
view. I seem to remember he agreed with me, though.


I can only get trapsess to work with -l noAuthNoPriv.
My note in snmpd.conf says:
# Keep getting parsing failed errors

Sorry, Birgit


On 09/04/08 22:36, Josh Bers wrote:
> Has anyone been able to get net-snmp to send authenticated and encrypted v3
> traps to a Westhawk manager... I am running into loads of problems using
> net-snmp 5.3.1. It never seems to use the local user name or USM security
> parameters!
> 
> Any pointers would be much appreciated.
> 
> Josh
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Josh Bers [mailto:jbers@bbn.com] 
> Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 5:11 PM
> To: 'Dave Shield'
> Cc: 'net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net'
> Subject: RE: sending V3 traps with trapsess
> 
> Now I am using 5.3.1 and getting the following error when I configure
> trapsess (found in /var/log/message):
> 
> Snmpd[pid]: snmpd: send_trap: USM unknown security name (no such user
> exists)
> 
> This is strange because on the line above the trapsess entry in
> /etc/snmp/snmpd.conf I declare the user as a rwuser snmproot!
> 
> Is there some other configuration file that I need to tell about the users
> that I will use in trapsess from the snmpd agent?
> 
> Josh
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Josh Bers [mailto:jbers@bbn.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 2:43 PM
> To: 'Dave Shield'
> Cc: 'net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net'
> Subject: RE: sending V3 traps with trapsess
> 
> Dave,
> 
> OK, I will be upgrading shortly to net-snmp 5.3.1. Would you expect with
> that version that the following trapsess will use the authoritative engineID
> of the currently running snmpd process when sending traps to
> <target-manager>?
> 
> trapsess -v 3 -u snmproot -a MD5 -A <rootAuthPass> -l authPriv -x DES -X
> <rootPrivPass> <target-manager>
> 
> 
> Josh
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: net-snmp-users-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net
> [mailto:net-snmp-users-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net] On Behalf Of Dave
> Shield
> Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 3:09 PM
> To: Josh Bers
> Cc: net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: sending V3 traps with trapsess
> 
> On 02/04/2008, Josh Bers <jbers@bbn.com> wrote:
>> I am seeing strange behavior when configuring snmpd to send traps using
>> trapsess command in the snmpd.conf file.
>>
>> When I don't specify an engineID explicitly it attempts to do discovery
> even
>> though I am not asking for INFORMS!
> 
>> I am using version 5.1.2. Does anyone know if this has been fixed
>> on later versions?
> 
> I've just tried this with both the current development code,
> and the 5.2.x line.   In both cases, the agent sends the trap
> immediately, with no engine probe.
> 
> I don't have a 5.1.x version immediately accessible, but I
> seem to remember something being added a while back to
> delay the engine probe for an SNMPv3 session until it
> was actually needed.   So I suspect that this problem has
> indeed been fixed in later releases.
> 
> Please note that the 5.1.x line was closed down about two
> years ago.   We would *strongly* recommend that you
> upgrade to a more recent version.
> 
> Dave
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
> It's the best place to buy or sell services for
> just about anything Open Source.
> http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace
> _______________________________________________
> Net-snmp-users mailing list
> Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
> 
> 

-- 
-- Birgit Arkesteijn, birgit@westhawk.co.uk,
-- Westhawk Ltd, Albion Wharf, 19 Albion Street, Manchester M1 5LN, UK
-- Company no: 1769350
-- Registered Office:
-- 15 London Road, Stockton Heath, Warrington WA4 6SJ. UK.
-- tel.: +44 (0)161 237 0660
-- <URL: http://www.westhawk.co.uk>
From jbers at bbn.com  Wed Apr 16 11:07:04 2008
From: jbers at bbn.com (Josh Bers)
Date: Wed Apr 16 15:07:53 2008
Subject: [snmp] RE: FW: sending V3 traps with trapsess
In-Reply-To: <4805D3D2.7080403@westhawk.co.uk>
Message-ID: <000401c89fcb$389a4170$fefe5980@7C911>

Birgit,

Somewhere I found a response saying that if you put the -e option with the
engine id from /var/net-snmp/snmpd.conf it works. I tried this and in fact
it does work even with authPriv. So the bug appears to be that trapsess does
not automatically determine (and use) the engine id for the agent. Once you
specify the engine id on the trapsess line it uses the right boots, and time
fields of the USM data and the stack can receive and decode the traps
correctly.

Here is the line in the config file for net-snmp snmpd 5.3.1 (compiled on
RHEL 4):

trapsess -e ENGINE_ID -v 3 -l authPriv -u USERNAME -a MD5 -A AUTH_PASS -x
DES -X PRIV_PASS TARGET_IP

where engine id is taken from /var/net-snmp/snmpd.conf oldEngineID field.

And username has been created using createUser in same file
(/var/net-snmp..)

Josh

Ps. My next task is to get linkup/linkdown traps working from the agent.


-----Original Message-----
From: Birgit Arkesteijn [mailto:birgit@westhawk.co.uk] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2008 6:24 AM
To: Josh Bers
Cc: 'List for discussion of the Westhawk SNMP stack'
Subject: Re: FW: sending V3 traps with trapsess

Dear Josh,

I've had problems in the past, but I think it's not the same problem, see
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=20060206182223.GB36
13%40westhawk.co.uk&forum_name=net-snmp-users

Unfortunately Wes' answer to my latest posting is omitted from this 
view. I seem to remember he agreed with me, though.


I can only get trapsess to work with -l noAuthNoPriv.
My note in snmpd.conf says:
# Keep getting parsing failed errors

Sorry, Birgit


On 09/04/08 22:36, Josh Bers wrote:
> Has anyone been able to get net-snmp to send authenticated and encrypted
v3
> traps to a Westhawk manager... I am running into loads of problems using
> net-snmp 5.3.1. It never seems to use the local user name or USM security
> parameters!
> 
> Any pointers would be much appreciated.
> 
> Josh
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Josh Bers [mailto:jbers@bbn.com] 
> Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 5:11 PM
> To: 'Dave Shield'
> Cc: 'net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net'
> Subject: RE: sending V3 traps with trapsess
> 
> Now I am using 5.3.1 and getting the following error when I configure
> trapsess (found in /var/log/message):
> 
> Snmpd[pid]: snmpd: send_trap: USM unknown security name (no such user
> exists)
> 
> This is strange because on the line above the trapsess entry in
> /etc/snmp/snmpd.conf I declare the user as a rwuser snmproot!
> 
> Is there some other configuration file that I need to tell about the users
> that I will use in trapsess from the snmpd agent?
> 
> Josh
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Josh Bers [mailto:jbers@bbn.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 2:43 PM
> To: 'Dave Shield'
> Cc: 'net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net'
> Subject: RE: sending V3 traps with trapsess
> 
> Dave,
> 
> OK, I will be upgrading shortly to net-snmp 5.3.1. Would you expect with
> that version that the following trapsess will use the authoritative
engineID
> of the currently running snmpd process when sending traps to
> <target-manager>?
> 
> trapsess -v 3 -u snmproot -a MD5 -A <rootAuthPass> -l authPriv -x DES -X
> <rootPrivPass> <target-manager>
> 
> 
> Josh
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: net-snmp-users-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net
> [mailto:net-snmp-users-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net] On Behalf Of Dave
> Shield
> Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 3:09 PM
> To: Josh Bers
> Cc: net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: sending V3 traps with trapsess
> 
> On 02/04/2008, Josh Bers <jbers@bbn.com> wrote:
>> I am seeing strange behavior when configuring snmpd to send traps using
>> trapsess command in the snmpd.conf file.
>>
>> When I don't specify an engineID explicitly it attempts to do discovery
> even
>> though I am not asking for INFORMS!
> 
>> I am using version 5.1.2. Does anyone know if this has been fixed
>> on later versions?
> 
> I've just tried this with both the current development code,
> and the 5.2.x line.   In both cases, the agent sends the trap
> immediately, with no engine probe.
> 
> I don't have a 5.1.x version immediately accessible, but I
> seem to remember something being added a while back to
> delay the engine probe for an SNMPv3 session until it
> was actually needed.   So I suspect that this problem has
> indeed been fixed in later releases.
> 
> Please note that the 5.1.x line was closed down about two
> years ago.   We would *strongly* recommend that you
> upgrade to a more recent version.
> 
> Dave
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
> It's the best place to buy or sell services for
> just about anything Open Source.
>
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace
> _______________________________________________
> Net-snmp-users mailing list
> Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
> 
> 

-- 
-- Birgit Arkesteijn, birgit@westhawk.co.uk,
-- Westhawk Ltd, Albion Wharf, 19 Albion Street, Manchester M1 5LN, UK
-- Company no: 1769350
-- Registered Office:
-- 15 London Road, Stockton Heath, Warrington WA4 6SJ. UK.
-- tel.: +44 (0)161 237 0660
-- <URL: http://www.westhawk.co.uk>


From jbers at bbn.com  Wed Apr 16 11:07:04 2008
From: jbers at bbn.com (Josh Bers)
Date: Wed Apr 16 15:46:08 2008
Subject: [snmp] RE: FW: sending V3 traps with trapsess
In-Reply-To: <4805D3D2.7080403@westhawk.co.uk>
Message-ID: <000401c89fcb$389a4170$fefe5980@7C911>

Birgit,

Somewhere I found a response saying that if you put the -e option with the
engine id from /var/net-snmp/snmpd.conf it works. I tried this and in fact
it does work even with authPriv. So the bug appears to be that trapsess does
not automatically determine (and use) the engine id for the agent. Once you
specify the engine id on the trapsess line it uses the right boots, and time
fields of the USM data and the stack can receive and decode the traps
correctly.

Here is the line in the config file for net-snmp snmpd 5.3.1 (compiled on
RHEL 4):

trapsess -e ENGINE_ID -v 3 -l authPriv -u USERNAME -a MD5 -A AUTH_PASS -x
DES -X PRIV_PASS TARGET_IP

where engine id is taken from /var/net-snmp/snmpd.conf oldEngineID field.

And username has been created using createUser in same file
(/var/net-snmp..)

Josh

Ps. My next task is to get linkup/linkdown traps working from the agent.


-----Original Message-----
From: Birgit Arkesteijn [mailto:birgit@westhawk.co.uk] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2008 6:24 AM
To: Josh Bers
Cc: 'List for discussion of the Westhawk SNMP stack'
Subject: Re: FW: sending V3 traps with trapsess

Dear Josh,

I've had problems in the past, but I think it's not the same problem, see
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=20060206182223.GB36
13%40westhawk.co.uk&forum_name=net-snmp-users

Unfortunately Wes' answer to my latest posting is omitted from this 
view. I seem to remember he agreed with me, though.


I can only get trapsess to work with -l noAuthNoPriv.
My note in snmpd.conf says:
# Keep getting parsing failed errors

Sorry, Birgit


On 09/04/08 22:36, Josh Bers wrote:
> Has anyone been able to get net-snmp to send authenticated and encrypted
v3
> traps to a Westhawk manager... I am running into loads of problems using
> net-snmp 5.3.1. It never seems to use the local user name or USM security
> parameters!
> 
> Any pointers would be much appreciated.
> 
> Josh
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Josh Bers [mailto:jbers@bbn.com] 
> Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 5:11 PM
> To: 'Dave Shield'
> Cc: 'net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net'
> Subject: RE: sending V3 traps with trapsess
> 
> Now I am using 5.3.1 and getting the following error when I configure
> trapsess (found in /var/log/message):
> 
> Snmpd[pid]: snmpd: send_trap: USM unknown security name (no such user
> exists)
> 
> This is strange because on the line above the trapsess entry in
> /etc/snmp/snmpd.conf I declare the user as a rwuser snmproot!
> 
> Is there some other configuration file that I need to tell about the users
> that I will use in trapsess from the snmpd agent?
> 
> Josh
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Josh Bers [mailto:jbers@bbn.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 2:43 PM
> To: 'Dave Shield'
> Cc: 'net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net'
> Subject: RE: sending V3 traps with trapsess
> 
> Dave,
> 
> OK, I will be upgrading shortly to net-snmp 5.3.1. Would you expect with
> that version that the following trapsess will use the authoritative
engineID
> of the currently running snmpd process when sending traps to
> <target-manager>?
> 
> trapsess -v 3 -u snmproot -a MD5 -A <rootAuthPass> -l authPriv -x DES -X
> <rootPrivPass> <target-manager>
> 
> 
> Josh
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: net-snmp-users-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net
> [mailto:net-snmp-users-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net] On Behalf Of Dave
> Shield
> Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 3:09 PM
> To: Josh Bers
> Cc: net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: sending V3 traps with trapsess
> 
> On 02/04/2008, Josh Bers <jbers@bbn.com> wrote:
>> I am seeing strange behavior when configuring snmpd to send traps using
>> trapsess command in the snmpd.conf file.
>>
>> When I don't specify an engineID explicitly it attempts to do discovery
> even
>> though I am not asking for INFORMS!
> 
>> I am using version 5.1.2. Does anyone know if this has been fixed
>> on later versions?
> 
> I've just tried this with both the current development code,
> and the 5.2.x line.   In both cases, the agent sends the trap
> immediately, with no engine probe.
> 
> I don't have a 5.1.x version immediately accessible, but I
> seem to remember something being added a while back to
> delay the engine probe for an SNMPv3 session until it
> was actually needed.   So I suspect that this problem has
> indeed been fixed in later releases.
> 
> Please note that the 5.1.x line was closed down about two
> years ago.   We would *strongly* recommend that you
> upgrade to a more recent version.
> 
> Dave
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
> It's the best place to buy or sell services for
> just about anything Open Source.
>
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace
> _______________________________________________
> Net-snmp-users mailing list
> Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
> 
> 

-- 
-- Birgit Arkesteijn, birgit@westhawk.co.uk,
-- Westhawk Ltd, Albion Wharf, 19 Albion Street, Manchester M1 5LN, UK
-- Company no: 1769350
-- Registered Office:
-- 15 London Road, Stockton Heath, Warrington WA4 6SJ. UK.
-- tel.: +44 (0)161 237 0660
-- <URL: http://www.westhawk.co.uk>


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference 
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. 
Use priority code J8TL2D2. 
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users

From shrouk.tharwat at gmail.com  Thu Apr 24 04:16:27 2008
From: shrouk.tharwat at gmail.com (Shrouk Tharwat)
Date: Thu Apr 24 12:44:22 2008
Subject: [snmp] OID for packets per second
Message-ID: <a74e97d00804240316g2a73c8f2h7ca98d1cc8df07ef@mail.gmail.com>

Dears;

Does anyone know the OID for getting the number of packets per second?? and
if  its not possibe using the OID ,is there any other alternative?

Thanks;
Shrouk
From birgit at westhawk.co.uk  Thu Apr 24 13:53:59 2008
From: birgit at westhawk.co.uk (Birgit Arkesteijn)
Date: Thu Apr 24 12:54:08 2008
Subject: [snmp] OID for packets per second
In-Reply-To: <a74e97d00804240316g2a73c8f2h7ca98d1cc8df07ef@mail.gmail.com>
References: <a74e97d00804240316g2a73c8f2h7ca98d1cc8df07ef@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <481074D7.9080904@westhawk.co.uk>

Hi Shrouk,

I assume you mean the number of packet per second of an interface?

uk.co.westhawk.snmp.pdu.InterfaceGetNextPdu.java
gives you the speed, but that's
(number of octets transmitted & received) per second.

Not sure if that helps.

Cheers, Birgit


On 24/04/08 11:16, Shrouk Tharwat wrote:
> Dears;
> 
> Does anyone know the OID for getting the number of packets per second?? and
> if  its not possibe using the OID ,is there any other alternative?
> 
> Thanks;
> Shrouk

-- 
-- Birgit Arkesteijn, birgit@westhawk.co.uk,
-- Westhawk Ltd, Albion Wharf, 19 Albion Street, Manchester M1 5LN, UK
-- Company no: 1769350
-- Registered Office:
-- 15 London Road, Stockton Heath, Warrington WA4 6SJ. UK.
-- tel.: +44 (0)161 237 0660
-- <URL: http://www.westhawk.co.uk>
From shrouk.tharwat at gmail.com  Wed Apr 30 17:58:51 2008
From: shrouk.tharwat at gmail.com (Shrouk Tharwat)
Date: Wed Apr 30 15:56:17 2008
Subject: [snmp] OID for packets per second
In-Reply-To: <481074D7.9080904@westhawk.co.uk>
References: <a74e97d00804240316g2a73c8f2h7ca98d1cc8df07ef@mail.gmail.com>
	<481074D7.9080904@westhawk.co.uk>
Message-ID: <a74e97d00804300658q4ef35549y7f15e9335fe2a4ae@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Birgit,

What i mean is that i need to plot the number of packets per REAL time
second for the whole system including all interfaces . so does the OID of
the IP input receives gets me the packets per second per interface or does
it get the total number of packets since the system started up? and do u
know how can i get by any means the number of  packets per second for a
certain interval of time?


Thanks;
Shrouk
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 2:53 PM, Birgit Arkesteijn <birgit@westhawk.co.uk>
wrote:

> Hi Shrouk,
>
> I assume you mean the number of packet per second of an interface?
>
> uk.co.westhawk.snmp.pdu.InterfaceGetNextPdu.java
> gives you the speed, but that's
> (number of octets transmitted & received) per second.
>
> Not sure if that helps.
>
> Cheers, Birgit
>
>
>
> On 24/04/08 11:16, Shrouk Tharwat wrote:
>
>> Dears;
>>
>> Does anyone know the OID for getting the number of packets per second??
>> and
>> if  its not possibe using the OID ,is there any other alternative?
>>
>> Thanks;
>> Shrouk
>>
>
> --
> -- Birgit Arkesteijn, birgit@westhawk.co.uk,
> -- Westhawk Ltd, Albion Wharf, 19 Albion Street, Manchester M1 5LN, UK
> -- Company no: 1769350
> -- Registered Office:
> -- 15 London Road, Stockton Heath, Warrington WA4 6SJ. UK.
> -- tel.: +44 (0)161 237 0660
> -- <URL: http://www.westhawk.co.uk>
> _______________________________________________
> snmp mailing list
> snmp@snmp.westhawk.co.uk
> http://snmp.westhawk.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/snmp
>